THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Jamie, Dr. Lederberg, I'd like to
thank you for your service in this and so many other ways. I would like
to thank Sandy Berger for many things, including indulging my nagging on
this subject for the better part of six years now.
I was so relieved that Dr. Lederberg not very long ago -- well, last
year -- brought a distinguished panel of experts together to discuss
this bioterrorism threat, because I then had experts to cite on my
concern and nobody thought I was just reading too many novels late at
night. (Laughter.)
Madame Attorney General, Secretary Shalala, Secretary Richardson,
Director Witt, Deputy Secretary Hamre, Commandant of the Coast Guard and
our other military leaders who are here, Mr. Clarke, ladies and
gentlemen. I'm delighted to be here to discuss this subject. With some
trepidation, Sandy Berger noted that Dr. Lederberg won a Nobel Prize at
33, and I was governor -- you can infer from that that I was not very
good at chemistry and biology. (Laughter.)
But any democracy is imbued with the responsibility of ordinary
citizens who do not have extraordinary expertise to meet the challenges
of each new age. And that is what we are all trying to do. Our country
has always met the challenges of those who would do us harm. At the
heart of our national defense I have always believed is our attempt to
live by our values -- democracy, freedom, equal opportunity. We are
working hard to fulfill these values at home. And we are working with
nations around the world to advance them, to build a new era of
interdependence where nations work together -- not simply for peace and
security, but also for better schools and health care, broader
prosperity, a cleaner environment and a greater involvement by citizens
everywhere in shaping their own future.
In the struggle to defend our people and values and to advance them
wherever possible, we confront threats both old and new -- open borders
and revolutions in technology have spread the message and the gifts of
freedom but have also given new opportunities to freedom's enemies.
Scientific advances have opened the possibility of longer, better lives.
They have also given the enemies of freedom new opportunities.
Last August, at Andrews Air Force Base, I grieved with the families of
the brave Americans who lost their lives at our embassy in Kenya. They
were in Africa to promote the values America shares with friends of
freedom everywhere -- and for that they were murdered by terrorists.
So, too, were men and women in Oklahoma City, at the World Trade Center,
Khobar Towers, on Pan Am 103.
The United States has mounted an aggressive response to terrorism --
tightening security for our diplomats, our troops, our air travelers,
improving our ability to track terrorist activity, enhancing cooperation
with other countries, strengthening sanctions on nations that support
terrorists.
Since 1993, we have tripled funding for FBI anti-terrorist efforts.
Our agents and prosecutors, with excellent support from our intelligence
agencies, have done extraordinary work in tracking down perpetrators of
terrorist acts and bringing them to justice. And as our air strikes
against Afghanistan -- or against the terrorist camps in Afghanistan --
last summer showed, we are prepared to use military force against
terrorists who harm our citizens. But all of you know the fight against
terrorism is far from over. And now, terrorists seek new tools of
destruction.
Last May, at the Naval Academy commencement, I said terrorist and
outlaw states are extending the world's fields of battle, from physical
space to cyberspace, from our earth's vast bodies of water to the
complex workings of our own human bodies. The enemies of peace realize
they cannot defeat us with traditional military means. So they are
working on two new forms of assault, which you've heard about today:
cyber attacks on our critical computer systems, and attacks with weapons
of mass destruction -- chemical, biological, potentially even nuclear
weapons. We must be ready -- ready if our adversaries try to use
computers to disable power grids, banking, communications and
transportation networks, police, fire and health services -- or military
assets.
More and more, these critical systems are driven by, and linked
together with, computers, making them more vulnerable to disruption.
Last spring, we saw the enormous impact of a single failed electronic
link, when a satellite malfunctioned -- disabled pagers, ATMs, credit
card systems and television networks all around the world. And we
already are seeing the first wave of deliberate cyber attacks -- hackers
break into government and business computers, stealing and destroying
information, raiding bank accounts, running up credit card charges,
extorting money by threats to unleash computer viruses.
The potential for harm is clear. Earlier this month, an ice storm in
this area crippled power systems, plunging whole communities into
darkness and disrupting daily lives. We have to be ready for
adversaries to launch attacks that could paralyze utilities and services
across entire regions. We must be ready if adversaries seek to attack
with weapons of mass destruction, as well. Armed with these weapons,
which can be compact and inexpensive, a small band of terrorists could
inflict tremendous harm.
Four years ago, though, the world received a wake-up call when a group
unleashed a deadly chemical weapon, nerve gas, in the Tokyo subway. We
have to be ready for the possibility that such a group will obtain
biological weapons. We have to be ready to detect and address a
biological attack promptly, before the disease spreads. If we prepare
to defend against these emerging threats we will show terrorists that
assaults on America will accomplish nothing but their own downfall.
Let me say first what we have done so far to meet this challenge.
We've been working to create and strengthen the agreement to keep
nations from acquiring weapons of mass destruction, because this can
help keep these weapons away from terrorists, as well. We're working to
ensure the effective implementation of the Chemical Weapons Convention;
to obtain an accord that will strengthen compliance with the biological
weapons convention; to end production of nuclear weapons material. We
must ratify the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty to end nuclear tests once
and for all.
As I proposed Tuesday in the State of the Union Address, we should
substantially increase our efforts to help Russia and other former
Soviet nations prevent weapons material and knowledge from falling into
the hands of terrorists and outlaw states. In no small measure we
should do this by continuing to expand our cooperative work with the
thousands of Russian scientists who can be used to advance the causes of
world peace and health and well-being, but who if they are not paid,
remain a fertile field for the designs of terrorists.
But we cannot rely solely on our efforts to keep weapons from
spreading. We have to be ready to act if they do spread. Last year, I
obtained from Congress a 39 percent budget increase for chemical and
biological weapons preparedness. This is helping to accelerate our
ongoing effort to train and equip fire, police and public health
personnel all across our country to deal with chemical and biological
emergencies. It is helping us to ready armed forces and National Guard
units in every region to meet this challenge; and to improve our
capacity to detect an outbreak of disease and save lives; to create the
first ever civilian stockpile of medicines to treat people exposed to
biological and chemical hazards; to increase research and development on
new medicines and vaccines to deal with new threats.
Our commitment to give local communities the necessary tools already
goes beyond paper and plans. For example, parked just outside this
building is a newly designed truck we have provided to the Arlington,
Virginia, Fire Department. It can rapidly assist and prevent harm to
people exposed to chemical and biological dangers.
But our commitment on the cyber front has been strong, as well. We've
created special offices within the FBI and the Commerce Department to
protect critical systems against cyber attack. We're building
partnerships with the private sector to find and reduce vulnerabilities;
to improve warning systems; to rapidly recover if attacks occur. We
have an outstanding public servant in Richard Clarke, who is
coordinating all these efforts across our government.
Today, I want to announce the new initiatives we will take, to take us
to the next level in preparing for these emerging threats. In my
budget, I will ask Congress for $10 billion to address terrorism and
terrorist-emerging tools. This will include nearly $1.4 billion to
protect citizens against chemical and biological terror -- more than
double what we spent on such programs only two years ago.
We will speed and broaden our efforts, creating new local emergency
medical teams, employing in the field portable detection units the size
of a shoe box to rapidly identify hazards; tying regional laboratories
together for prompt analysis of biological threats. We will greatly
accelerate research and development, centered in the Department of
Health and Human Services, for new vaccines, medicines and diagnostic
tools.
I should say here that I know everybody in this crowd understands this,
but everyone in America must understand this: the government has got to
fund this. There is no market for the kinds of things we need to
develop; and if we are successful, there never will be a market for
them. But we have got to do our best to develop them. These
cutting-edge efforts will address not only the threat of weapons of mass
destruction, but also the equally serious danger of emerging infectious
diseases. So we will benefit even if we are successful in avoiding
these attacks.
The budget proposal will also include $1.46 billion to protect
critical systems from cyber and other attacks. That's 40 percent more
than we were spending two years ago. Among other things, it will help
to fund four new initiatives. First, an intensive research effort to
detect intruders trying to break into critical computer systems.
Second, crime -- excuse me -- detection networks, first for our Defense
Department, and later for other key agencies so when one critical
computer system is invaded, others will be alerted instantly. And we
will urge the private sector to create similar structures.
Third, the creation of information centers in the private sector so
that our industries can work together and with government to address
cyber threats. Finally, we'll ask for funding to bolster the
government's ranks of highly skilled computer experts -- people capable
of preventing and responding to computer crises.
To implement this proposal, the Cyber Corps program, we will encourage
federal agencies to train and retrain computer specialists, as well as
recruiting gifted young people out of college.
In all our battles, we will be aggressive. At the same time I want you
to know that we will remain committed to uphold privacy rights and other
constitutional protections, as well as the proprietary rights of
American businesses. It is essential that we do not undermine liberty
in the name of liberty. We can prevail over terrorism by drawing on the
very best in our free society -- the skill and courage of our troops,
the genius of our scientists and engineers, the strength of our factory
workers, the determination and talents of our public servants, the
vision of leaders in every vital sector.
I have tried as hard as I can to create the right frame of mind in
America for dealing with this. For too long the problem has been that
not enough has been done to recognize the threat and deal with it. And
we in government, frankly, weren't as well organized as we should have
been for too long. I do not want the pendulum to swing the other way
now, and for people to believe that every incident they read about in a
novel or every incident they see in a thrilling movie is about to happen
to them within the next 24 hours.
What we are seeing here, as any military person in the audience can
tell you, is nothing more than a repetition of weapons systems that goes
back to the beginning of time. An offensive weapons system is
developed, and it takes time to develop the defense. And then another
offensive weapon is developed that overcomes that defense, and then
another defense is built up -- as surely as castles and moats held off
people with spears and bows and arrows and riding horses, and the
catapult was developed to overcome the castle and the moat.
But because of the speed with which change is occurring in our society
-- in computing technology, and particularly in the biological sciences
-- we have got to do everything we can to make sure that we close the
gap between offense and defense to nothing, if possible. That is the
challenge here.
We are doing everything we can, in ways that I can and in ways that I
cannot discuss, to try to stop people who would misuse chemical and
biological capacity from getting that capacity. This is not a cause for
panic -- it is a cause for serious, deliberate, disciplined, long-term
concern. And I am absolutely convinced that if we maintain our clear
purpose and our strength of will, we will prevail here. And thanks to
so many of you in this audience, and your colleagues throughout the
United States, and like-minded people throughout the world, we have
better than a good chance of success. But we must be deliberate, and we
must be aggressive.
Thank you very much. (Applause.)
END
10:45 A.M. EST