(GC(39)/OR.7, Para 35) For its part, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) had called upon the nuclear-weapon States “to take positive steps towards fulfilling their obligations as regards the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons”. Also, the NAM members which were also parties to the NPT had demanded that the nuclear-weapon States honour the letter and spirit of the NPT and of the “Principles and Objectives for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament”. 

(GC(39)/OR.7, Para 35) For its part, the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) had called upon the nuclear-weapon States “to take positive steps towards fulfilling their obligations as regards the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons”. Also, the NAM members which were also parties to the NPT had demanded that the nuclear-weapon States honour the letter and spirit of the NPT and of the “Principles and Objectives for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament”. 

(GC(42)/OR.5, Para 14) The NAM Summit had noted the establishment of the ad hoc committee on negative security assurances and commended the establishment of an ad hoc committee to negotiate a fissile material cut-off treaty. It had also reiterated its endorsement of the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on the early conclusion of a nuclear weapons convention, while noting with concern the persistence of undue restrictions on exports to developing countries of material, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes and emphasizing the need for transparency in that regard. It had also called on nuclear-weapon States to comply with Article VI of the NPT, recognized the need for an instrument to prohibit attacks or threats of attacks on nuclear facilities used for peaceful purposes, and welcomed the United Nations General Assembly's adoption of a resolution to convene a fourth special session devoted to disarmament. 

(GC(42)/OR.5, Para 14) The NAM Summit had noted the establishment of the ad hoc committee on negative security assurances and commended the establishment of an ad hoc committee to negotiate a fissile material cut-off treaty. It had also reiterated its endorsement of the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on the early conclusion of a nuclear weapons convention, while noting with concern the persistence of undue restrictions on exports to developing countries of material, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes and emphasizing the need for transparency in that regard. It had also called on nuclear-weapon States to comply with Article VI of the NPT, recognized the need for an instrument to prohibit attacks or threats of attacks on nuclear facilities used for peaceful purposes, and welcomed the United Nations General Assembly's adoption of a resolution to convene a fourth special session devoted to disarmament. 

(GC(42)/OR.5, Para 13) The Heads of Government at the NAM Summit in Durban earlier that month had reiterated the need for an action plan to achieve total elimination within a specified time and had called for an international conference to be held, preferably by 1999, to agree on such a plan. The international community should not focus on the issue of non-proliferation at the expense of nuclear disarmament, nor should it focus on horizontal proliferation at the expense of vertical proliferation. 

(GC(42)/OR.5, Para 14) The NAM Summit had noted the establishment of the ad hoc committee on negative security assurances and commended the establishment of an ad hoc committee to negotiate a fissile material cut-off treaty. It had also reiterated its endorsement of the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on the early conclusion of a nuclear weapons convention, while noting with concern the persistence of undue restrictions on exports to developing countries of material, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes and emphasizing the need for transparency in that regard. It had also called on nuclear-weapon States to comply with Article VI of the NPT, recognized the need for an instrument to prohibit attacks or threats of attacks on nuclear facilities used for peaceful purposes, and welcomed the United Nations General Assembly's adoption of a resolution to convene a fourth special session devoted to disarmament. 

(GC(42)/OR.5, Para 13) The Heads of Government at the NAM Summit in Durban earlier that month had reiterated the need for an action plan to achieve total elimination within a specified time and had called for an international conference to be held, preferably by 1999, to agree on such a plan. The international community should not focus on the issue of non-proliferation at the expense of nuclear disarmament, nor should it focus on horizontal proliferation at the expense of vertical proliferation. 

(GC(42)/OR.5, Para 14) The NAM Summit had noted the establishment of the ad hoc committee on negative security assurances and commended the establishment of an ad hoc committee to negotiate a fissile material cut-off treaty. It had also reiterated its endorsement of the International Court of Justice's advisory opinion on the early conclusion of a nuclear weapons convention, while noting with concern the persistence of undue restrictions on exports to developing countries of material, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes and emphasizing the need for transparency in that regard. It had also called on nuclear-weapon States to comply withArticle VI of the NPT, recognized the need for an instrument to prohibit attacks or threats of attacks on nuclear facilities used for peaceful purposes, and welcomed the United Nations General Assembly's adoption of a resolution to convenea fourth special session devoted to disarmament. 

(GC(47)/OR.4, Para 20) Mr. HANIFF (Malaysia), speaking on behalf of NAM, noted that a Vienna Chapter of the Movement had been establishedpursuant to the 13th NAM Summit Conference held in February 2003. NAM Member States felt that it should play an active role in issues before the Agency, in close cooperation with the Group of 77 and China. 

(GC(47)/OR.4, Para 21) At that Conference, the NAM Member States had expressed strong concern at the growing resort to unilateralism and unilaterally imposed prescriptions, and had reaffirmed that multilateralism and multilaterally agreed solutions, in accordance with the United Nations Charter, were the only sustainable way of addressing disarmament and international security issues. 

(GC(48)/OR.6, Para 67) Mr. DAUD MOHAMAD (Malaysia), speaking on behalf of NAM, drew attention to certain points of relevance to the Agency and its work contained in the final document of the XIV Ministerial Conference of NAM, held in Durban, South Africa, in August 2004, and to the Durban Declaration on Multilateralism issued by that Conference. In the Durban Declaration, the NAM Ministers had expressed strong concern at the growing resort to unilateralism and unilaterally imposed methods, and had reaffirmed the Movement’s commitment to advancing multilateralism. Concerning nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament, they had welcomed the adoption of General Assembly resolution 58/44 on the promotion of multilateralism in the area of disarmament and non-proliferation, and had again emphasized the importance of efforts aiming at non-proliferation being parallel to simultaneous efforts aiming at nuclear disarmament. The Ministers had further reaffirmed the inalienable right of developing countries to engage in research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination, and had continued to note with concern that undue restrictions on exports to developing countries of material, equipment and technology for peaceful purposes persisted. In that regard, the Ministerial Conference had expressed strong rejection of attempts by any Member State to use the Agency’s technical cooperation programme as a tool for political purposes in violation of the Agency’s Statute. 

(GC(65)/OR.11, Para 23) NAM States Parties to the NPT regretted that, despite intensive consultations, at the 2015 NPT Review Conference it had not been possible to reach agreement on the draft Final Document, which could have a negative impact on the NPT regime. 

(GC(66)/OR.7, Para 109) NAM States Parties to the NPT regretted that, despite intensive consultations, at the 2015 NPT Review Conference it had not been possible to reach agreement on the draft Final Document, a failure which could have a negative impact on the NPT regime. 

(GC(66)/OR.7, Para 113) Lastly, noting that NAM was fully committed to cooperating with the Director General and supporting his efforts to implement resolution GC(65)/RES/14, he said that NAM expected all other Member States to do likewise.